Header

Wednesday 4 September 2013

IGNOU BCA 4th sem Solved Assignment - Why are multiple accesses required in LAN technologies? Compare different multiple accesses techniques.

Why are multiple accesses required in LAN technologies? Compare different multiple accesses techniques.
Ans
multiple access protocols - by which nodes regulate their transmission onto the shared broadcast channel.  multiple access protocols are needed in a wide variety of network settings, including both wired and wireless local area networks, and satellite networks. Although technically each node accesses the broadcast channel through its adapter, in this section we will refer to the node as the sending and receiving device. In practice, hundreds or even thousands of nodes can directly communicate over a broadcast channel. 
  
In order to ensure that the broadcast channel performs useful work when multiple nodes are active, it is necessary to somehow coordinate the transmissions of the active nodes. This coordination job is the responsibility of the multiple access protocol. Over the past thirty years, thousands of papers and hundreds of Ph.D. dissertations have been written on multiple access protocols; a comprehensive survey of this body of work is [Rom 1980] Furthermore, dozens of different protocols have been implemented in a variety of link-layer technologies. Nevertheless, we can classify just about any multiple access protocol as belonging to one of three categories: channel partitioning protocolsrandom access protocols, and taking-turns protocols.  We'll cover these categories of multiple access protocols in the following three subsections.  Let us conclude this overview by noting that ideally, a multiple access protocol for a broadcast channel of rate R bits per second should have the following desirable characteristics:
1.      When only one node has data to send, that node has a throughput of R bps.
2.      When nodes have data to send, each of these nodes has a throughput of  R/M bps. This need not necessarily imply that each of the M nodes always have an instantaneous rate of R/M , but rather that each  node should have an average transmission rate of R/M over some suitably-defined interval of time.
3.      The protocol is decentralized, i.e., there are no master nodes that can fail and bring down the entire system.
4.      The protocol is simple, so that it is inexpensive to implement.


Cellular systems divide a geographic region into cells where a mobile unit in each cell communicates with a base station. The goal in the design of cellular systems is to be able to handle as many calls as possible (this is called capacity in cellular terminology) in a given bandwidth with some reliability. There are several different ways to allow access to the channel. These include the following.
·         frequency division multiple-access (FDMA)
·         time division multiple-access (TDMA)
·         time/frequency multiple-access
·         random access
·         code division multiple-access (CDMA)
o    frequency-hop CDMA
o    direct-sequence CDMA
o    multi-carrier CDMA (FH or DS)
As mentioned earlier, FDMA was the initial multiple-access technique for cellular systems. In this technique a user is assigned a pair of frequencies when placing or receiving a call. One frequency is used for downlink (base station to mobile) and one pair for uplink (mobile to base). This is called frequency division duplexing. That frequency pair is not used in the same cell or adjacent cells during the call. Even though the user may not be talking, the spectrum cannot be reassigned as long as a call is in place. Two second generation cellular systems (IS-54, GSM) use time/frequency multiple-access whereby the available spectrum is divided into frequency slots (e.g., 30 kHz bands) but then each frequency slot is divided into time slots. Each user is then given a pair of frequencies (uplink and downlink) and a time slot during a frame. Different users can use the same frequency in the same cell except that they must transmit at different times. This technique is also being used in third generation wireless systems (e.g., EDGE).
Code division multiple-access techniques allow many users to simultaneously access a given frequency allocation. User separation at the receiver is possible because each user spreads the modulated waveform over a wide bandwidth using unique spreading codes. There are two basic types of CDMA. Direct-sequence CDMA (DS-CDMA) spreads the signal directly by multiplying the data waveform with a user-unique high bandwidth pseudo-noise binary sequence. The resulting signal is then mixed up to a carrier frequency and transmitted. The receiver mixes down to baseband and then re-multiplies with the binary {± 1} pseudo-noise sequence. This effectively (assuming perfect synchronization) removes the pseudo-noise signal and what remains (of the desired signal) is just the transmitted data waveform. After removing the pseudo-noise signal, a filter with bandwidth proportional to the data rate is applied to the signal. Because other users do not use completely orthogonal spreading codes, there is residual multiple-access interference present at the filter output.
This multiple-access interference can present a significant problem if the power level of the desired signal is significantly lower (due to distance) than the power level of the interfering user. This is called the near-far problem. Over the last 15 years there has been considerable theoretical research on solutions to the near-far problem beginning with the derivation of the optimal multiuser receiver and now with many companies (e.g., Fujitsu, NTT DoCoMo, NEC) building suboptimal reduced complexity multiuser receivers. The approach being considered by companies is either successive interference cancellation or parallel interference cancellation. One advantage of these techniques is that they generally do not require spreading codes with period equal to the bit duration. Another advantage is that they do not require significant complexity (compared to a minimum mean square error-MMSE-detector or a decorrelating detector). These interference cancellation detectors can also easily be improved by cascading several stages together.
As a typical example, Fujitsu has a multistage parallel interference canceler with full parallel structure that allows for short processing delay. Accurate channel estimation is possible using pilot and data symbols. Soft decision information is passed between stages, which improves the performance. Fujitsu's system uses 1-2 stages giving fairly low complexity. Fujitsu claims that the number of users per cell increases by about a factor of 2 (100%) compared to conventional receivers and 1.3 times if intercell interference is considered. 
       Very costly

·         Hard to install
The data transmission capabilities of various Medias vary differently depending upon the various factors. These factors are:

1. Bandwidth. It refers to the data carrying capacity of a channel or medium. Higher bandwidth communication channels support higher data rates.
2. Radiation. It refers to the leakage of signal from the medium due to undesirable electrical characteristics of the medium.
3. Noise Absorption. It refers to the susceptibility of the media to external electrical noise that can cause distortion of data signal.
4. Attenuation. It refers to loss of energy as signal propagates outwards. The amount of energy lost depends on frequency. Radiations and physical characteristics of media contribute to attenuation

No comments:

Post a Comment